SOURCE-LINKED DEVELOPER GUIDE

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna

Compare officially documented Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna API pricing, context limits, developer workflows and benchmark caveats.

Verified Oct 8, 2026 · Independent research · No inference tests by this site

Overview

Both names are officially documented public models. Compare the API configurations you intend to use rather than treating product names as a guarantee of equivalent behavior.

Feature Comparison

Official API featureClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Luna
Model IDclaude-haiku-5-5gpt-6-luna
Input / outputText and image / textText and image / text
ReasoningAdaptive thinkingConfigurable reasoning effort
Tool workflowClaude API toolsResponses API function calling

Pricing Comparison

Standard uncached USD per million tokens, written as input / output. Haiku changes tiers above 100K input tokens per request; Luna applies multipliers above 272K. The last Luna cell is arithmetic derived from its official 2× input and 1.5× output multipliers. These are not monthly volume thresholds.

Input length per requestHaiku 5.5 USD / millionGPT-6 Luna USD / million
Up to 100K$0.10 / $0.50$0.10 / $0.50
Above 100K through 272K$0.50 / $2.50$0.10 / $0.50
Above 272K$0.50 / $2.50$0.20 / $0.75 (calculated)

Coding and Reasoning

Anthropic publishes comparisons against GPT-6 Luna, but that is developer-reported evidence. Our linked benchmark guide preserves attribution and missing values. We have not run a matched head-to-head test, so no universal performance winner is claimed.

Context Windows

Official API limits: Haiku 5.5 lists a 1M-token context window and 128K maximum output; GPT-6 Luna lists 1,050,000 context tokens and 128,000 maximum output tokens. Check endpoint constraints and billed long-context tiers before using the maximum.

Developer Use Cases

  • Evaluate high-volume extraction and classification with a labeled dataset.
  • Test coding and tool workflows with the same permissions and completion criteria.
  • Measure the cost of long-context conversations separately from short requests.

Which One Should You Choose?

Start with the provider already integrated into your application, then compare correctness, tool reliability, latency and actual billed usage on a representative task set. Similar short-request list prices do not imply identical total cost. Unknown parameter counts are not a reason to invent a hardware comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Luna an official public model name?

Yes. OpenAI’s announcement and API documentation use this name and the gpt-6-luna identifier; both are linked here.

Which model is better for coding?

Published results are useful context, but we have not run a controlled comparison. Evaluate the same repository tasks, tools and reasoning budgets before choosing.

SOURCE NOTES

Go straight to the source

Reviewed Oct 8, 2026. Official statements, third-party results and arithmetic estimates are attributed separately. Unknowns reflect the sources reviewed on this date. No inference benchmarks were run by this site.

Anthropic launch Official name, October 7 release, availability and developer-reported benchmark comparisons.
Haiku 5.5 model overview API model ID, context, output limits and adaptive thinking.
Anthropic API pricing USD token prices, request-length tiers, cache and batch billing.
OpenAI GPT-6 Luna API reference Official identity, API capabilities, context limits and token prices.
OpenAI Sol and Luna announcement Public model names and availability.